Heads up: Some or all of the identifications affected by
this split may have been replaced with identifications of Caesalpinieae. This
happens when we can't automatically assign an identification to one of the
output taxa.
Review identifications of Caesalpinia 48315
Caesalpinia was split in Gagnon E, Bruneau A, Hughes CE, de Queiroz LP, Lewis GP (2016). "A new generic system for the pantropical Caesalpinia group (Leguminosae)". PhytoKeys. 71 (71): 1–160. doi:10.3897/phytokeys.71.9203
IDs of Caesalpinia (genus) will be reassigned to Caesalpinieae (tribe).
I'll take a crack at the Arizona observations. Most of them appear to be commonly cultivated species in urban areas.
Edit: Well, that was easy - there were only seven for the state. I think I can branch out a little.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
@ tagging some top identifiers who may be able to help refine these observations that are currently at rank=tribe for Caesalpinieae:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?reviewed=any&taxon_id=747312&lrank=tribe
@pioleon @jeanphilippeb @francisco3_tutor @blakesito @adorantes @ripleyrm @stevejones @najera_tutor @cwbarrows @susanmf @alexiz