FWIW, while I appreciate the discussion in the flag comments, and the fact that you performed such thorough consultation before committing this, I'd also appreciate a brief description here in the taxon change record about why this is happening, and some sourcing, e.g. here the source should probably be Amphibian Species of the World, but mentioning https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18625326 might be worth it too. Not everyone is willing to delve into an extensive discussion thread, and the only content that gets shared on dashboards and in emails is the taxon change description.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
FWIW, while I appreciate the discussion in the flag comments, and the fact that you performed such thorough consultation before committing this, I'd also appreciate a brief description here in the taxon change record about why this is happening, and some sourcing, e.g. here the source should probably be Amphibian Species of the World, but mentioning https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18625326 might be worth it too. Not everyone is willing to delve into an extensive discussion thread, and the only content that gets shared on dashboards and in emails is the taxon change description.