Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
why was this swap made? There has been a deviation in place saying that the taxa should remain separate https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/82374-Humulus-japonicus/taxonomy_details
and the previous flag also supported that https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/472957
why was this commited without any comments on the flag or deviation?